By Dennis Thompson

HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, April 5, 2021 (HealthDay News) — A or B, AB or O, it doesn’t matter — your blood style has nothing to do with your threat of contracting critical COVID-19, a new review concludes.

Early in the pandemic, some reviews recommended people with A-style blood had been much more susceptible to COVID, whilst these with O-style blood had been considerably less so.

But a evaluate of practically 108,000 individuals in a 3-point out health and fitness network has found no link at all among blood style and COVID threat.

“Considering that the commencing of this pandemic, there have been associations postulated among blood style and condition susceptibility,” said Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior scholar with the Johns Hopkins Heart for Wellbeing Protection.

“From this huge review, it seems that there is no affiliation among blood style and susceptibility or severity, and other explanations had been very likely existing,” additional Adalja, who experienced no role in the review.

An early report from China recommended that blood style may possibly impact COVID threat. Subsequent research from Italy and Spain backed that up, researchers said in history notes.

Nevertheless, other research out of Denmark and the United States made available combined and conflicting final results.

To very clear things up, researchers led by Dr. Jeffrey Anderson, from Intermountain Professional medical Heart Heart Institute in Murray, Utah, analyzed details from tens of hundreds of individuals with Intermountain Health care, a nonprofit health and fitness procedure of 24 hospitals and 215 clinics in Utah, Idaho and Nevada.

Of these in the analysis, practically eleven,500 examined good for coronavirus, whilst the relaxation examined negative.

Blood style did not perform a sizeable role in anyone’s threat of contracting COVID, the researchers noted April 5 in JAMA Community Open up.

“I’ve often said this entire thing with the blood sorts is much hoopla about nothing,” said Dr. Aaron Glatt, chairman of the division of medication and medical center epidemiologist at Mount Sinai South Nassau in Oceanside, N.Y. “It was never ever a sizeable plenty of thing that people must be terrified if they have just one sort of blood style or reassured if they have another blood style. It never ever made any functional variation.”


Glatt was not included in the new analysis.

He said the findings from earlier research display why correlation is not the similar as causation — in other words and phrases, why showing that two things are statistically joined is not the similar as proving that just one prompted the other.

“If you go and seem at plenty of things, you will discover some random incidental findings that may well or may well not have any significance,” Glatt said. “Some people appeared at so a lot of distinct variables and just one of them was blood style. They saw that some people did even worse with a selected blood style, but the research had been conflicting, which can make perception if it is random.”

Glatt concluded: “This puts this entire thing to relaxation, but it never ever must have been up.”

A lot more information

The U.S. Centers for Condition Management and Prevention has much more about COVID-19 threat things.

Resources: Amesh Adalja, MD, senior scholar, Johns Hopkins Heart for Wellbeing Protection, Baltimore Aaron Glatt, MD, chairman, division of medication, and medical center epidemiologist, Mount Sinai South Nassau, Oceanside, N.Y. JAMA Community Open up, April 5, 2021

WebMD News from HealthDay

Copyright © 2013-2020 HealthDay. All rights reserved.